Ruslaan syas, "It's a college love story with an MMS as the conflict point. It is inspired by the MMS scandal, where a video of two school goers having sex was leaked on Internet. Says Ruslaan, "It isn't a scandalous film. We shot the MMS-clip sequence carefully. You see, the boy had shot the clip without showing his face.

Several boys studying at the Delhi Public School DPS exchanged explicit photo clips of a female student engaged in a lewd act with a classmate on their cellular phones in the middle of last month. Within days, the MMS clip featuring the two students from one of Delhi's more prominent public schools found its way into the underground pornography market. Combining it with the latest scandal involving a year-old schoolgirl from Jammu who was videotaped having sex with a photographer in a cheap hotel, they sold it like hot cakes, calling it the DPS MMS Clip. Because the boy and girl involved in the DPS scandal belonged to upper crust families, because the more than year-old school had a cachet about it with parents going to great lengths to get their children admitted in it and because there was a voyeur inside most sexually repressed Indians, the demand for the short clip which the errant boy had filmed using his cellular phone camera was tremendous.

In a shocking incident of abuse of cellphones by children, a student of a leading public school in the capital filmed a sexually explicit visual of a girl, from the same institution, with a camera phone, which he then circulated as MMS. Both the boy and the girl as well as eight other students, of Delhi Public School, R K Puram, have been suspended for carrying cellphones to school, sources said. The school has also issued a point guideline for parents and children, especially barring the students from bringing cellphones to school, the sources said. The video clip, depicting the girl in a sexual act, was messaged by the boy to his friends and it got circulated to students in other schools.

Avnish Bajaj vs. Despite the fact that baazee. Upon investigation, a charge sheet was filed showing Ravi Raj, Avnish Bajaj, the owner of the website and Sharat Digumarti, the person responsible for handling the content, as accused. Since, Ravi Raj absconded; the petition was filed by Avnish Bajaj, seeking the quashing of the criminal proceedings.